Skip to main content
iRubric: Professional Development Plan Rubric

iRubric: Professional Development Plan Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Professional Development Plan Rubric 
The following rubric has been adapted by the ePortfolio Portal team as an example of the evaluation of eportfolios. The exact criteria will depend on the purpose of the evaluation. Source: http://www.danwilton.com/eportfolios/rubric.php
Rubric Code: AAWW49
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric PDP Evaluation
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Satisfactory

7 pts

Needs Improvement

5 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Statement of Purpose
2 pts

Excellent

Purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Good

Overall, the purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Satisfactory

The purpose of the portfolio is somewhat vague and unclear, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Needs Improvement

The purpose of the portfolio is very vague and unclear, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Unsatisfactory

The purpose of the portfolio is missing, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Professional Development Activities
5 pts

Excellent

All professional development activities are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized. Submitted assignments go beyond what is required. Extra effort is evident. There were no late submissions.
Good

All professional development activities are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized. Some submitted assignments go beyond what is required. Some extra effort is evident. There were no late submissions.
Satisfactory

Most professional and classroom samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. One or two examples are unorganized or unrelated. No extra effort given. 1-2 late submissions.
Needs Improvement

Several professional and classroom samples are not related to the purpose of the eportfolio. Several examples are unorganized and unclear. Little effort given. 3-4 late submissions.
Unsatisfactory

Most of the professional and classroom samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio. Missing assignments. No effort given. 5 or more late submissions.
Profile
1 pts

Excellent

Profile is clear and complete. Goes above and beyond what was required.
Good

Profile is clear and complete. Gives some additional information.
Satisfactory

Gives only information requested.
Needs Improvement

Leaves out information.
Unsatisfactory

Profile is not completed.
Descriptions
3 pts

Excellent

Each description contains an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional development material.
Good

Most of the descriptions contain an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional development material.
Satisfactory

Some of the descriptions contain explanations that clearly explain the significance of the professional development material.
Needs Improvement

Few of the descriptions contain explanations that clearly explain the significance of the professional development material.
Unsatisfactory

None of the descriptions contain an explanation.
Reflections
3 pts

Excellent

Reflections are present throughout the portfolio demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, and how learning was applied to the program field. There is a reflection for each activity.
Good

Reflections are present in the portfolio and demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, but may not include either how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field. There is a reflection for each activity, but the reflection is incomplete.
Satisfactory

1-2 reflections are missing. If they are present they do not provide any depth of understanding of how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Needs Improvement

3 or more reflections are missing. If they are present they do not provide any depth of understanding of how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Unsatisfactory

No reflections are present in the portfolio.
Layout and Design
3 pts

Excellent

The eportfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. The pages are well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds do not detract from the content. Movement between sections and pages is smooth. A lot of effort was put into the design and professionalism of the eportfolio.
Good

Overall, the portfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. On the majority of pages, content is well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds, overall, do not detract from the content. Only minor changes are needed to enhance the portfolio. Movement between sections and pages is smooth. Some extra effort was put into the design and professionalism of the eportfolio.
Satisfactory

The portfolio is somewhat difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Some of the pages are not balanced and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content. Movement between sections and pages may not smooth or easy to navigate. Required side headings were the only ones used. No extra effort given.
Needs Improvement

The portfolio is difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Most of the pages are not balanced or appear cluttered and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content. Movement between sections and pages is not smooth or easy to navigate. Missing parts. Little effort given.
Unsatisfactory

Poor layout and design. No effort given.
Grammar and Punctuation
3 pts

Excellent

There are no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Good

There are 3 or fewer errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Satisfactory

There are 4-5 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Needs Improvement

The text has more than 6-8 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Clearly, the portfolio was not proofread.
Unsatisfactory

The text has more than 8 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Very little effort if any was given.
Welcome
1 pts

Excellent

Welcome is clear and complete. Goes above and beyond what was required.
Good

Welcome is clear and complete. Gives some additional information.
Satisfactory

Gives only information requested.
Needs Improvement

Leaves out information.
Unsatisfactory

Welcome is not completed.



Keywords:
  • eportfolio, e-portfolio


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98