Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Professional Development Plan Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Professional Development Plan Rubric
ePortfolio Evaluation
The following rubric has been adapted by the ePortfolio Portal team as an example of the evaluation of eportfolios. The exact criteria will depend on the purpose of the evaluation. Source: http://www.danwilton.com/eportfolios/rubric.php
Rubric Code:
AAWW49
By
aagault
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
PDP Evaluation
Excellent
10 pts
Good
8 pts
Satisfactory
7 pts
Needs Improvement
5 pts
Unsatisfactory
0 pts
Statement of Purpose
2 pts
Excellent
Purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Good
Overall, the purpose of the portfolio is clear throughout the portfolio, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Satisfactory
The purpose of the portfolio is somewhat vague and unclear, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Needs Improvement
The purpose of the portfolio is very vague and unclear, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Unsatisfactory
The purpose of the portfolio is missing, in terms of philosophy and professional growth.
Professional Development Activities
5 pts
Excellent
All professional development activities are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized. Submitted assignments go beyond what is required. Extra effort is evident. There were no late submissions.
Good
All professional development activities are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized. Some submitted assignments go beyond what is required. Some extra effort is evident. There were no late submissions.
Satisfactory
Most professional and classroom samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. One or two examples are unorganized or unrelated. No extra effort given. 1-2 late submissions.
Needs Improvement
Several professional and classroom samples are not related to the purpose of the eportfolio. Several examples are unorganized and unclear. Little effort given. 3-4 late submissions.
Unsatisfactory
Most of the professional and classroom samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio. Missing assignments. No effort given. 5 or more late submissions.
Profile
1 pts
Excellent
Profile is clear and complete. Goes above and beyond what was required.
Good
Profile is clear and complete. Gives some additional information.
Satisfactory
Gives only information requested.
Needs Improvement
Leaves out information.
Unsatisfactory
Profile is not completed.
Descriptions
3 pts
Excellent
Each description contains an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional development material.
Good
Most of the descriptions contain an explanation that clearly explains the significance of the professional development material.
Satisfactory
Some of the descriptions contain explanations that clearly explain the significance of the professional development material.
Needs Improvement
Few of the descriptions contain explanations that clearly explain the significance of the professional development material.
Unsatisfactory
None of the descriptions contain an explanation.
Reflections
3 pts
Excellent
Reflections are present throughout the portfolio demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, and how learning was applied to the program field. There is a reflection for each activity.
Good
Reflections are present in the portfolio and demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, but may not include either how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field. There is a reflection for each activity, but the reflection is incomplete.
Satisfactory
1-2 reflections are missing. If they are present they do not provide any depth of understanding of how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Needs Improvement
3 or more reflections are missing. If they are present they do not provide any depth of understanding of how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Unsatisfactory
No reflections are present in the portfolio.
Layout and Design
3 pts
Excellent
The eportfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. The pages are well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds do not detract from the content. Movement between sections and pages is smooth. A lot of effort was put into the design and professionalism of the eportfolio.
Good
Overall, the portfolio is easy to read. Design features, such as font and size, titles, subtitles, page headings, and paragraphs enhance the portfolio. On the majority of pages, content is well-balanced and pictures and backgrounds, overall, do not detract from the content. Only minor changes are needed to enhance the portfolio. Movement between sections and pages is smooth. Some extra effort was put into the design and professionalism of the eportfolio.
Satisfactory
The portfolio is somewhat difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Some of the pages are not balanced and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content. Movement between sections and pages may not smooth or easy to navigate. Required side headings were the only ones used. No extra effort given.
Needs Improvement
The portfolio is difficult to read. Formatting is awkward and design features detract from the content. Most of the pages are not balanced or appear cluttered and backgrounds are overdone and are distracting or do not compliment the content. Movement between sections and pages is not smooth or easy to navigate. Missing parts. Little effort given.
Unsatisfactory
Poor layout and design. No effort given.
Grammar and Punctuation
3 pts
Excellent
There are no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Good
There are 3 or fewer errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Satisfactory
There are 4-5 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Needs Improvement
The text has more than 6-8 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Clearly, the portfolio was not proofread.
Unsatisfactory
The text has more than 8 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Very little effort if any was given.
Welcome
1 pts
Excellent
Welcome is clear and complete. Goes above and beyond what was required.
Good
Welcome is clear and complete. Gives some additional information.
Satisfactory
Gives only information requested.
Needs Improvement
Leaves out information.
Unsatisfactory
Welcome is not completed.
Keywords:
eportfolio, e-portfolio
Subjects:
Business
(General)
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.