RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: ePortfolio Rubric

iRubric: ePortfolio Rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

ePortfolio Rubric built by teacher

Rubric Code: A4779
Rubric for assessing ePortfolios. This rubric is from http://www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/mm/UBC/510/eportfoliorubric.htm
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: ePortfolio
Categories: Subjects: Arts and Design   Computers   (General)  
Types: Project   Presentation   Assignment   ePortfolio   (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric ePortfolio Rubric
  Excellent
4 pts Meets the Standard of Excellence
Good
3 pts Approaches the Standard of Excellence
Fair
2 pts Clearly Meets the Acceptable Standard
Poor
1 pts Does Not Clearly Meet the Acceptable Standard
Selection
Selection of Learning Samples
Excellent

-All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the portfolio.

-A wide variety of learning samples are used
Good

-Most artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the portfolio

- A variety of learning samples are used.
Fair

-Some artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose.

-Some variety of learning samples are used
Poor

-All artefacts are unrelated to the purpose of the portfolio

-All learning samples are of the same genre
Reflections
Excellent

- All reflections clearly describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for continued learning.

-All reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Good

- Most of the reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for future learning.

-Most of the reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Fair

-Some reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and include goals for future learning.

-Some reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Poor

No reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal and do not include goals for future learning.

-No reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work or provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives.
Captions
Excellent

-All of the artifacts are accompanied that articulately explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, date, standard addressed and description of the importance of the artifact.
Good

-Most of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, date, standard addressed and description of the importance of the artifact.
Fair

-Some of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, date, standard addressed and description of the importance of the artifact.
Poor

-None of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, date, standard addressed and description of the importance of the artifact.
Writing Mechanics
Excellent

-The writing demonstrates confident control of usage and mechanics

-The relative absence of errors is impressive considering the complexity of the response.
Good

-The writing demonstrates competent control of usage and mechanics

-Any errors do not reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the writing
Fair

The writing demonstrates general control of usage and mechanics

-Errors that are present may reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the response
Poor

-The writing demonstrates faltering control of usage and mechanics

-Errors reduce the clarity and interrupt the flow of the
Use of Multimedia
Excellent

-All of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate examples for one or more standards.
Good

- Most of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate examples for one or more standards.
Fair

-A few of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video are inappropriate and no not enhance reflective statements or create interest, and are inappropriate examples for one or more standards.
Poor

-The photographs, graphics, sounds, and/or videos are inappropriate, do not enhance reflective statements, and are inappropriate examples for one or more standards or are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.
Ease of Navigation
Excellent

-All of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents.
-All external links to all connecting websites connect
Good

-Most of the portfolio navigation links and most sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents.
-Most of the external links to connecting websites connect.
Fair

-Some of the portfolio navigation links and some sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents, but in other places the links do not connect to preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Some of the external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Poor

-There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) do not connect back to the main table of contents or preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Many external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Layout and Text Elements
Excellent

-The eportfolio is easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. -The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Good

-The eportfolio is generally easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. A few minor format changes would improve readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately in most places.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text in most places
Fair

-The eportfolio is often difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Some formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately in some places. -The background and colors are distracting in some places and decrease the readability of text.
Poor

-The eportfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Many formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately and the content appears cluttered.
-The background and colors are distracting and decrease the readability of text.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2014 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.