Skip to main content
iRubric: Project 4: Unit 3 Design Scenario (Barrier-free facility) rubric

iRubric: Project 4: Unit 3 Design Scenario (Barrier-free facility) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project 4: Unit 3 Design Scenario (Barrier-free facility) 
Project 2: Illustrated Guide to OBC Section 3.8 Development
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your project. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of project to ensure that all intended elements of your process have been represented and all criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: WBA54B
By KGHumberID
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criteria
  Excellent (90%+)

Exemplary 95% - Advanced 90%
Skill levels are exceptional. Work is executed at an advanced level for this course

4.75 pts

Above Average (80 – 89%)

Excellent 85% - Proficient 80%
Most skill levels are very good
with some exceptions. Work is executed at a proficient level for this course

4.25 pts

Average (66% -79%)

High Average 75% - Average 70%
Some skill levels are developing well, but others need improvement.
Work is executed at an average level for this course

3.75 pts

Below Average (50% - 65%)

Acceptable 65% - Below average 60%
Much development is needed 55%
Barely passing effort 50%

2.5 pts

Unacceptable (Below 50%)

Unacceptable 45%
Skill levels are unsatisfactory.
Submission does not demonstrate understanding of the skill sets taught in this course

0 pts

Creating
10 %

Integration of all criteria as identified in checklist for barrier‐free design
criteria created by student designer
Excellent (90%+)

Planning of the space(s) clearly documents advanced application of appropriate governmental requirements.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Planning of the space(s) clearly documents minimum governmental requirements.
Average (66% -79%)

Planning of the space(s) is missing relevant criteria relating to the requirements for barrier-free design.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Planning of the space is ineffective and does not meet building regulations.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Selecting / Analysing
40 %

Inclusive interpretation of barrier‐free requirements
Excellent (90%+)

Planning of the space(s) demonstrates exceptional consideration for additional requirements that nurture user well-being.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Planning of the space(s) demonstrates competent consideration for additional requirements that nurture user well-being.
Average (66% -79%)

Planning of the space(s) demonstrates basic consideration for additional requirements that nurture user well-being.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Planning of the space(s) does not demonstrate consideration for user well-being beyond minimum building regulations.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Applying
10 %

Detail and accuracy of drawings, thoroughness of submission
Excellent (90%+)

Drawings are high quality, scaled appropriately, annotated thoroughly and developed as templates which will be useful for future design work.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Drawings are competent quality, scaled appropriately, annotated sufficiently and developed as templates which will be useful for future design work.
Average (66% -79%)

Drawings are lower quality, there are issues of scale, they are minimally annotated and not well developed as templates which will be useful for future design work.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Drawings and notes are not of a quality which suits purpose intended.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Presenting
40 %

Creative design solution with well –resolved planning for function
Excellent (90%+)

A well-considered, professional quality design solution is proposed.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

A competent design solution is proposed.
Average (66% -79%)

A basic design solution is proposed.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

A design solution which lacks development of detail or spatial quality is proposed.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.



Keywords:
  • Project 4: Unit 3 Design Scenario (Barrier-free facility)



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98