Skip to main content
iRubric: Project 3: Design Audit Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Project 3: Design Audit Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project 3: Design Audit Evaluation 
Project 2: Illustrated Guide to OBC Section 3.8 Development
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your project. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of project to ensure that all intended elements of your process have been represented and all criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: NBA539
By KGHumberID
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criteria
  Excellent (90%+)

Exemplary 95% - Advanced 90%
Skill levels are exceptional. Work is executed at an advanced level for this course

22.5 pts

Above Average (80 – 89%)

Excellent 85% - Proficient 80%
Most skill levels are very good
with some exceptions. Work is executed at a proficient level for this course

18.75 pts

Average (66% -79%)

High Average 75% - Average 70%
Some skill levels are developing well, but others need improvement.
Work is executed at an average level for this course

16 pts

Below Average (50% - 65%)

Acceptable 65% - Below average 60%
Much development is needed 55%
Barely passing effort 50%

12 pts

Unacceptable (Below 50%)

Unacceptable 45%
Skill levels are unsatisfactory.
Submission does not demonstrate understanding of the skill sets taught in this course

0 pts

Creating
20 %

Through review of chosen environment
Excellent (90%+)

Review and narrative of chosen environment reflects Checklist developed in Project 2 (exceeds minimum governmental requirements with additional considerations for user well-being)
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Review and narrative of chosen environment reflects Checklist developed in Project 2.
(meets minimum governmental requirements with additional considerations for user well-being)
Average (66% -79%)

Review and narrative of chosen environment reflects Checklist developed in Project 2. (missing some key points or relevant information relating to the requirements for barrier-free design)
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Many key points are missing and review of environment / checklist is not inclusive.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Observing
20 %

Depth of observations
Excellent (90%+)

Observations, reflection and response via narrative of tour through space represents well-considered conclusive and important areas of design and focuses on inclusive design of built environments.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Observations, reflection and response via narrative of tour through space represents most barriers of inclusive design for built environments.
Average (66% -79%)

Choice of detailed scenarios does not provide a well-considered palette of varying spaces and / or is not representative of inclusive design of built environments.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Incomplete consideration of important design scenarios for inclusive and barrier-free design.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Analysing
20 %

Correct Identification of Code references
Excellent (90%+)

Code references are accurate and informed.
There is an extra effort to cross reference other guiding documents.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Code references are accurate and informed.
There is some effort to cross reference other guiding documents.
Average (66% -79%)

Code references are accurate and informed.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Code references are inaccurate and not informed.There are numerous errors
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.
Applying
20 %

Sensitive and accurate representation of physical impairments
Excellent (90%+)

The observations and narrative reflect a mature, professional and sensitive consideration for physically or cognitively impaired persons.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

Sensitivity and professionalism is expected at the highest level. Students who are observed demonstrating anything less shall receive a zero for this project.
Average (66% -79%)
Below Average (50% - 65%)
Unacceptable (Below 50%)
Presenting
20 %

Quality of presentation using appropriate digital media
Excellent (90%+)

Thorough, diligent, professional quality work with an effort at high quality presentation.
Above Average (80 – 89%)

A mostly professional quality work with an effort at high quality presentation.
Average (66% -79%)

Some issues of quality related to use of media, narrative or presentation.
Below Average (50% - 65%)

Significant issues of completeness, quality or effort.
Unacceptable (Below 50%)

This element has not been submitted or lacks sufficient work to evaluate.



Keywords:
  • Project 3: Design Audit Evaluation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98